Publications

BACKGROUND

Indirect evidence and modeling analyses suggest that colonoscopy may be the most cost-effective way to screen the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia. However, the success and safety of primary colonoscopic screening has not been prospectively evaluated in a multicenter trial.

METHODS

Asymptomatic subjects age 50 to 75 years who had not undergone examination of the colon within 10 years were recruited from the general medicine clinics of 13 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Eligible patients underwent colonoscopy by study coinvestigators, at which time all polyps were measured, photographed, and removed. Patients were contacted at 24 hours and 1 week to track procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

Primary screening colonoscopy was performed in a cohort of 3196 asymptomatic subjects. A "good" preparation was reported in 81% of patients, and colonoscopy to the cecum was successful in 97.2% of cases. Mean insertion time to the cecum and total procedure times were 10.5 (8.7) and 30.6 (19.1) minutes, respectively. No preprocedural patient characteristics were identified that were predictive of an incomplete procedure. At least one polyp was resected in 1672 patients. There was no perforation and no death attributed to colonoscopy. Major morbidity considered to be definitely related to colonoscopy occurred in 9 of 3196 procedures (0.3%): lower GI bleeding requiring intervention (6), myocardial infarction and/or cerebrovascular accident (2), and thrombophlebitis (1). In subjects undergoing only diagnostic procedures, the major complication rate was 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening colonoscopy can be performed in multiple centers with a high degree of success and safety in large numbers of asymptomatic, average-risk men.

The role of G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands in intestinal epithelial cell signaling and proliferation is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that arginine vasopressin (AVP) induces multiple intracellular signal transduction pathways in rat intestinal epithelial IEC-18 cells via a V(1A) receptor. Addition of AVP to these cells induces a rapid and transient increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration and promotes protein kinase D (PKD) activation through a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway, as revealed by in vitro kinase assays and immunoblotting with an antibody that recognizes autophosphorylated PKD at Ser(916). AVP also stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) and promotes Src family kinase phosphorylation at Tyr(418), indicative of Src activation. AVP induces extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)-1 (p44(mapk)) and ERK-2 (p42(mapk)) activation, a response prevented by treatment with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors (PD-98059 and U-0126), specific PKC inhibitors (GF-I and Ro-31-8220), depletion of Ca(2+) (EGTA and thapsigargin), selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tyrphostin AG-1478, compound 56), or the selective Src family kinase inhibitor PP-2. Furthermore, AVP acts as a potent growth factor for IEC-18 cells, inducing DNA synthesis and cell proliferation through ERK-, Ca(2+)-, PKC-, EGFR tyrosine kinase-, and Src-dependent pathways.

OBJECTIVE

Community physicians in the United States prescribe antibiotics to 80% to 90% of smokers with acute bronchitis. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the efficacy of antibiotics for smokers with acute bronchitis.

DESIGN

A medline search was done using the keywords bronchitis, cough, and antibiotics to identify English language articles published from January 1966 to September 2001. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics in previously healthy smokers and nonsmokers with acute bronchitis were included.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each study, we abstracted information on design, size, inclusion criteria, patient characteristics, and outcomes. Of 2,029 articles in the original search, 109 relevant articles were retrieved and reviewed. There have been no studies specifically addressing antibiotic use in smokers with acute bronchitis. Nine randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics have included 774 patients and over 276 smokers. Lack of subgroup reporting for smokers precluded meta-analysis. In 7 trials, smoking status did not predict or alter patients' response to antibiotics. In one trial, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resulted in less-frequent cough overall, but not among smokers. In another trial, erythromycin reduced symptom scores only among nonsmokers while antibiotic-treated smokers had a trend toward higher symptom scores.

CONCLUSION

Although no trials have specifically addressed antibiotic use in smokers with acute bronchitis, existing data suggest that any benefit of antibiotics is the same or less for smokers than for nonsmokers.

INTRODUCTION

Both second hand smoke (SHS) and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contribute to endothelial dysfunction and increased infarct size in a rat ischaemia-reperfusion model. However, the potential interaction between SHS and the RAS is unknown.

METHODS

Eighty-four rats were randomised into four groups: group C was a normal control; L was given 40 mg/kg/day of losartan in drinking water; SC and SL were exposed to SHS (smoking chamber) and given regular water or 40 mg/kg/day of losartan in drinking water, respectively. After six weeks of pre-treatment, rats were subjected to 17 minutes of left coronary artery occlusion and 2 hours of reperfusion with haemodynamic and ECG monitoring.

RESULTS

Haemodynamics were not significantly different among the four groups. Losartan increased the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (p=0.0001) and reduced spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.002) during ischaemia-reperfusion, while SHS did not (p=0.713, 0.110), and there was no interaction between losartan and SHS. The maximal endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation induced by a calcium ionophore (A23187) was increased by losartan (p=0.007). Myocardial infarct size was smaller in the losartan groups (p=0.032), larger in the SHS groups (p=0.0001), and there was no significant interaction.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, losartan decreased infarct size and increased endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. SHS exposure impaired endothelial function and increased infarct size. The effects of losartan and SHS were consistently independent of each other. These results suggest that the RAS does not contribute to the adverse effects of SHS.