Publications

INTRODUCTION

The presence of T-cell reactivity to alphaB-crystallin in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has suggested that this small molecular weight heat shock protein (Hsp) may be an autoantigen in MS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have tested the serum of patients with clinically definite MS (n=30), other inflammatory neurological disease (n=22), non-inflammatory neurological disease (n=42) and healthy individuals (n=23) for systemic humoral responses to bovine alphaB-crystallin, to the homologous chaperone protein, alphaA-crystallin, and to another small Hsp, Hsp 27.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent of MS patients exhibited immunoreactivity to alpha-crystallin and this was present in all 4 of 4 non-ambulatory patients with MS. In contrast, serum concentrations in MS patients of antibodies to the small Hsp, Hsp27, and to myelin basic protein were negligible (P<0.001). Serum anti-alpha-crystallin immune responses were detected in significantly lower percentages of patients with other inflammatory neurological diseases (32%, P<0.025), and with non-inflammatory neurological diseases (12%, P<0.001). None of the healthy control individuals showed anti-alpha-crystallin reactivity. The concentration of anti-alpha-crystallin antibodies in patients with MS correlated with severe disease (P<0.05) and with active disease (P<0.025).

CONCLUSION

Our observations support the notion that anti-alpha-crystallin autoimmune responses may contribute to pathogenicity in MS and may represent a mechanism of how recurrent attacks of MS develop subsequent to an isolated demyelinating episode.

Recent family-based studies have revealed evidence for linkage of human chromosome 5q31 to the diagnosis of asthma, elevated serum IgE levels, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Among the candidate genes in this region is the gene encoding for human interleukin-4 (IL-4). We reasoned that this gene could also serve as a candidate gene with respect to asthma severity as indicated by the FEV(1) measured when bronchodilator treatment was withheld. To test this hypothesis, we examined a large population of patients with asthma (ascertained without respect to genetic characteristics), for associations between a genetic variant in the IL-4 promoter region (C-589T) and asthma severity, as indicated by FEV(1). We used amplification by the polymerase chain reaction followed by BsmF1 restriction digestion to assign genotypes at the IL-4 promoter C-589T locus. We compared genotypes at this locus in 772 Caucasian and African American patients with asthma of varying severity, and we used multiple regression analysis to relate genotypic findings to FEV(1). Among white individuals, the homozygous presence of the C-589T IL-4 promoter genotype (TT) was associated with a FEV(1) below 50% of predicted (p = 0.013; OR, 1.44; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.90). Subjects with the TT genotype had mean FEV(1) (% predicted) values 4.5% lower than those of subjects with the wild-type (CC) genotype at this locus. FEV(1) values of white patients with a CC or CT genotype were broadly distributed, whereas the TT genotype was associated with a narrow distribution of low FEV(1) values. The frequency of the T allele was significantly greater (p = 1 x 10(-)(23)) among African American asthmatics (0.544) than among white asthmatics (0.183). These data provide the first evidence associating FEV(1) in patients with asthma and genetic determinants at any locus. Our data are consistent with the idea that the FEV(1) in asthma is the result of multiple factors; one of these factors is the genotype at the IL-4 C-589T locus. This locus is associated with a small but significant decrement in pulmonary function among white asthmatic subjects.

OBJECTIVE

To describe barriers to participation of African Americans in research.

DESIGN

Focus group interviews conducted in 1997.

PATIENTS

Thirty-three African-American adults presenting to an urban public hospital for outpatient medical care participated in one of five focus groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

African-American patients' attitudes toward medical research were measured. Mistrust of doctors, scientists, and the government was reported consistently by the participants. Many participants described concerns about the ethical conduct of clinicians and investigators when poor or minority patients are involved and cited examples of exploitation as supporting evidence for their mistrust of the medical establishment. While participants were clear about the violation of human rights in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, all were misinformed of the historical facts of the study. Few participants understood the concept of informed consent. Participants saw signing the document as relinquishing their autonomy and as a legal protection for physicians. Despite these concerns, participants gave recommendations to improve minority participation in research.

CONCLUSIONS

African-American participants in this study described distrust of the medical community as a prominent barrier to participation in clinical research. Participants described real and perceived examples of exploitation to support their distrust of researchers. The goal of the consent process, to inform patients of risks and benefits so as to facilitate self-determination, was misinterpreted by these participants. Understanding the importance of interpersonal trust within the clinical relationship may prove to be a significant factor in enhancing participation in clinical trials.