Publications

BACKGROUND

Unhoused patients have worse surgical outcomes than the general population. However, the drivers of this inequity have not been studied.

METHODS

We conducted 26 semi-structured interviews of clinicians who care for patients with surgical disease, using a purposive sampling strategy to intentionally recruit participants with significant experience caring for unhoused patients across different roles. We used thematic analysis to analyze the resulting data.

RESULTS

We conducted 26 interviews: 11 with surgeons (42%), 8 with internal medicine physicians (30%), 2 with surgical advanced practice providers (8%), 3 with social workers or case managers (11%), and 2 with registered nurses (8%). One-third of the participants worked in either medical respite or street medicine programs. We identified 5 themes, each of which was most relevant at a distinct point along the spectrum of surgical care: (1) patients and clinicians face multiple challenges meeting preoperative requirements, (2) although surgeons do not make major operative decisions based on housing status, some take it into consideration for minor care decisions, (3) clinicians perceive that unhoused patients have negative postoperative experiences in the hospital, (4) discharge options for unhoused patients are commonly imperfect, which can lead to inadequate postoperative care, (5) challenges with formal communication between surgeons and non-surgeons are amplified when caring for unhoused patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians who care for unhoused patients with surgical disease relayed multiple challenges throughout all phases of surgical care and relied on both formal and informal mechanisms to mitigate these challenges. There may be opportunities to intervene and improve access to surgical care for this vulnerable group.