Publications

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of BAL fluid cell count differential in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. We hypothesized that baseline BAL fluid cell count differential (ie, elevated levels of neutrophils and eosinophils, or reduced levels of lymphocytes) would predict higher mortality among persons with IPF.

METHODS

We evaluated the association of BAL fluid cell count differential and mortality among 156 persons with surgical lung biopsy-proven IPF who underwent bronchoscopy with BAL and cell count differential measurements at presentation. Vital status was obtained among all participants. Cox regression analysis evaluated the association of BAL fluid cell count differential and mortality.

RESULTS

After controlling for known clinical predictors of mortality, we found that each doubling of baseline BAL fluid neutrophil percentage was associated with a 30% increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.62; adjusted p = 0.04) in the first year after presentation. We observed no association with BAL fluid lymphocyte percentage and mortality (adjusted HR per doubling, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29; p = 0.93) or eosinophil percentage and mortality (adjusted HR per doubling, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.40; p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased BAL fluid neutrophil percentage is an independent predictor of early mortality among persons with IPF. Alternatively, BAL fluid lymphocyte and eosinophil percentages were not associated with mortality. The clinical utility of BAL at the time of diagnosis of IPF should be reconsidered.

OBJECTIVES

To test whether the addition of melatonin to bright-light therapy enhances the efficacy in treating rest-activity (circadian) disruption in institutionalized patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Two nursing homes in San Francisco, California.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty subjects (mean age 86) with AD.

INTERVENTION

Experimental subjects received 1 hour of morning light exposure (> or = 2,500 lux in gaze direction) Monday to Friday for 10 weeks and 5 mg melatonin (LM, n=16) or placebo (LP, n=17) in the evening. Control subjects (n=17) received usual indoor light (150-200 lux).

MEASUREMENTS

Nighttime sleep variables, day sleep time, day activity, day:night sleep ratio, and rest-activity parameters were determined using actigraphy.

RESULTS

Linear mixed models were employed to test the primary study hypotheses. No significant differences in nighttime sleep variables were found between groups. At the end of the intervention, the LM group showed significant improvement in daytime somnolence as indicated by a reduction in the duration of daytime sleep, an increase in daytime activity, and an improvement in day:night sleep ratio. The LM group also evidenced a significant increase in rest-activity rhythm amplitude and goodness of fit to the cosinor model.

CONCLUSION

Light treatment alone did not improve nighttime sleep, daytime wake, or rest-activity rhythm. Light treatment plus melatonin increased daytime wake time and activity levels and strengthened the rest-activity rhythm. Future studies should resolve the question of whether these improvements can be attributed to melatonin or whether the two zeitgebers interact to amplify efficacy.