Publications

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease is rising in the United States, which bears high financial and public health burden. The most common modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the United States is in-center hemodialysis. Many patients report lack of comprehensive and timely education about their treatment options, which may preclude them from participating in home-based dialysis therapies and kidney transplantation evaluation. While RRT education has traditionally been provided in-person, the rise of telehealth has afforded new opportunities to improve upon the status quo. For example, technology-augmented RRT education has recently been implemented into telehealth nephrology clinics, informational websites and mobile applications maintained by professional organizations, patient-driven forums on social media, and multimodality programs. The benefits of technology in RRT education are increased access for geographically isolated and/or medically frail patients, versatility of content delivery, information repetition to enhance knowledge retention, and interpersonal connection for educational content and emotional support. Challenges center around privacy and accuracy of information sharing, in addition to differential access to technology due to age and socioeconomic status. A review of available scholarly and social media resources suggests that technology-aided delivery of education about treatment options for end-stage renal disease provides an important alternative and/or supplemental resource for patients and families.

BACKGROUND

Traditional palliation for biventricular cyanotic congenital heart lesions often involves staging with systemic-to-pulmonary arterial shunts to secure pulmonary blood flow (PBF) in the newborn period prior to complete repair. However, shunts may lead to life-threatening events secondary to shunt occlusion or acute coronary steal. They may be associated with morbidity secondary to diastolic runoff, systemic steal and volume loading, and do not provide pulsatile flow which has the potential to promote pulmonary artery (PA) growth. We have alternatively performed modified right ventricular outflow (mRVO) procedures by establishing antegrade right ventricle-to-PA flow.

METHODS

Retrospective review of data on all patients who underwent the mRVO procedure from 2013 to 2016, including anatomy, number of interstage catheterizations, reoperations, intensive care unit admissions, hypercyanotic episodes, interval to complete repair, and mortality.

RESULTS

Seventeen nonconsecutive patients included tetralogy of Fallot (n = 14), pulmonary valve stenosis (n = 2), and 1 with pulmonary atresia-intact septum; 14 had significant branch PA stenosis. Median age of first mRVO procedure was 14 days (range 5-193), and median duration of follow-up was 15.3 months (range 4-47 months). No patients had post-palliation acute hypercyanotic episodes. Nine were admitted to the ICU for persistent interstage hypoxemia, 7 of whom required reintervention prior to complete repair, which was achieved in 11 patients. Two late deaths unrelated to mRVO occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The mRVO procedure is a potential option with satisfactory results. It avoids potential shunt-related sudden death. The physiology of the mRVO palliation may provide unique benefits by providing antegrade pulsatile PBF, facilitates catheter interventions, and avoids branch PA distortion and stenosis.

We conducted a cluster-randomized trial to estimate effects of directly observed combination antiretroviral therapy (DOT-cART) on retention with viral suppression among HIV-positive adults in Peru. We randomly allocated facilities to receive the 12-month intervention plus the standard of care, including adherence support provided through accompaniment. In the intervention arm, health workers supervised doses, twice daily, and accompanied patients to appointments. Among 356 patients, intention-to-treat analyses showed no statistically significant benefit of DOT, relative to no-DOT, at 12 or 24 months (adjusted probability of primary outcome: 0.81 vs. 0.73 and 0.76 vs. 0.68, respectively). A statistically significant benefit of DOT was found in per-protocol and as-treated analyses at 12 months (0.83 for DOT vs. 0.73 for no DOT, p value: 0.02 per-protocol, 0.01 as-treated), but not 24 months. Rates of retention with viral suppression were high in both arms. Among adults receiving robust adherence support, the added effect of time-limited DOT, if any, is small-to-moderate.