Publications

IMPORTANCE

Burnout is a self-reported job-related syndrome increasingly recognized as a critical factor affecting physicians and their patients. An accurate estimate of burnout prevalence among physicians would have important health policy implications, but the overall prevalence is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the methods used to assess burnout and provide an estimate of the prevalence of physician burnout.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Systematic search of EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE/PubMed, psycARTICLES, and psycINFO for studies on the prevalence of burnout in practicing physicians (ie, excluding physicians in training) published before June 1, 2018.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Burnout prevalence and study characteristics were extracted independently by 3 investigators. Although meta-analytic pooling was planned, variation in study designs and burnout ascertainment methods, as well as statistical heterogeneity, made quantitative pooling inappropriate. Therefore, studies were summarized descriptively and assessed qualitatively.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Point or period prevalence of burnout assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

Burnout prevalence data were extracted from 182 studies involving 109 628 individuals in 45 countries published between 1991 and 2018. In all, 85.7% (156/182) of studies used a version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess burnout. Studies variably reported prevalence estimates of overall burnout or burnout subcomponents: 67.0% (122/182) on overall burnout, 72.0% (131/182) on emotional exhaustion, 68.1% (124/182) on depersonalization, and 63.2% (115/182) on low personal accomplishment. Studies used at least 142 unique definitions for meeting overall burnout or burnout subscale criteria, indicating substantial disagreement in the literature on what constituted burnout. Studies variably defined burnout based on predefined cutoff scores or sample quantiles and used markedly different cutoff definitions. Among studies using instruments based on the MBI, there were at least 47 distinct definitions of overall burnout prevalence and 29, 26, and 26 definitions of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment prevalence, respectively. Overall burnout prevalence ranged from 0% to 80.5%. Emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment prevalence ranged from 0% to 86.2%, 0% to 89.9%, and 0% to 87.1%, respectively. Because of inconsistencies in definitions of and assessment methods for burnout across studies, associations between burnout and sex, age, geography, time, specialty, and depressive symptoms could not be reliably determined.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review, there was substantial variability in prevalence estimates of burnout among practicing physicians and marked variation in burnout definitions, assessment methods, and study quality. These findings preclude definitive conclusions about the prevalence of burnout and highlight the importance of developing a consensus definition of burnout and of standardizing measurement tools to assess the effects of chronic occupational stress on physicians.

Introduction

Men who have sex with men (MSM) experience high rates of binge drinking, alcohol use disorder (AUD), and alcohol-related health issues. Pharmacotherapy for AUD can reduce hazardous drinking, yet remains underutilized among MSM. This qualitative study examined knowledge and perceptions regarding AUD medications among MSM, with an emphasis on naltrexone.

Methods

Three focus group discussions (FGDs) with MSM who consumed alcohol in the past year were conducted in February 2015 ( = 39) in the San Francisco Bay Area. The FGD guide generated discussions about hazardous drinking, the social contexts of drinking, and alcohol reduction and cessation options, including pharmacotherapy. Interviews were analyzed via directed content analysis to codify themes.

Results

For participants, drinking at LGBTQ bars was an important social activity. Many expressed interest in reducing alcohol use, but few had heard of pharmacotherapy for AUD. Potential uptake was limited by perceptions of disulfiram as the prototype medication, side effects associated with disulfiram, and concerns that medications do not address alcohol-related stigma or social drivers of drinking. Participants were more receptive to pharmacotherapy when presented with medication options that did not require abstinence. Participants reported being more likely to try pharmacotherapy as part of a peer group or treatment program.

Conclusions

Efforts to increase the knowledge and availability of naltrexone and harm reduction approaches, while addressing addiction- and medication-related stigma, might improve pharmacotherapy uptake for AUD and decrease hazardous drinking among MSM for whom alcohol holds social significance.