Publications

BACKGROUND

The Organ Care System (OCS), an ex vivo heart perfusion platform, represents an alternative to the current standard of cold organ storage that sustains the donor heart in a near-physiologic state. Previous reports showed that this system had significantly shortened the cold ischemic time from standard cold storage (CS). However, the effect of reduced ischemic injury against the coronary vascular bed has not been examined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

Between August 2011 and February 2013, heart transplant (HTx) candidates enrolled in the PROCEED 2 trial were randomized to either CS or OCS. IVUS was performed at 4-6 weeks (baseline) and repeated 1 year after transplantation. The change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) and other clinical outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were randomized and underwent HTx by OCS (n=16) or CS (n=18). Of these, 18 patients (OCS: n=5, CS: n=13) with paired IVUS were examined. There were no significant differences in the change of MIT and other clinical outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in donor hearts preserved with the OCS versus CS was similar. These results suggest that this ex vivo allograft perfusion system is a promising and valid platform for donor heart transportation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The effect of gender on use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not well established. The purpose of this review is to understand gender-based differences in response to DAPT, so that treatment of ACS can be optimized in women to prevent ischemic events while minimizing bleeding risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are innate gender differences in platelet reactivity and response. However, it is unknown if this translates into differences in clinical outcomes. In all major studies evaluating the effect of DAPT in ACS, women are underrepresented. Hence, the results from the existing trials cannot be generalizable to women. There is a significant knowledge gap regarding how to balance the bleeding and ischemic risk profile among women with ACS. Currently, there is no recommendation to consider gender as covariate in choosing the type of antiplatelet drug or duration. The existing clinical evidence is limited by under representation of women in DAPT trials. The current literature does not strongly support considering gender in decision making regarding type or duration of DAPT after ACS. Future dedicated trial designs with adequate representation from women and gender specific analysis from large registry data are warranted to enhance our understanding of the interaction of gender with DAPT after ACS.