Publications

BACKGROUND

A 12-dose, once-weekly regimen of isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) is effective in preventing tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We sought to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of acceptance and completion of 3HP treatment from the perspective of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and health workers in a routine HIV care setting in Kampala, Uganda.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 PLHIV and 10 health workers at an HIV/AIDS clinic in Kampala, Uganda. For both groups, we explored their understanding and interpretations of TB and TB preventive therapy (TPT), and perceptions about social and contextual factors that might influence the willingness of PLHIV to initiate and complete 3HP. We analyzed the data using an inductive thematic approach and aligned the emergent themes to the Behavior Change Wheel framework to identify sources of behavior and targeted behavior change interventions.

RESULTS

Facilitators of acceptance and completion of 3HP treatment among PLHIV were fear of contracting TB, awareness of being at risk of getting TB, willingness to take TPT, trust in health workers, and the perceived benefits of directly observed therapy (DOT) and self-administered therapy (SAT) 3HP delivery strategies. Barriers included inadequate understanding of TPT, fear of potential side effects, concerns about the effectiveness of 3HP, and the perceived challenges of DOT or SAT. Among health workers, perceived facilitators included knowledge that TB is a common cause of mortality for PLHIV, fear of getting TB, and trust in the health workers by PLHIV, the advantages of once-weekly 3HP dosing, and the benefits of DOT and SAT 3HP delivery strategies. Health worker-reported barriers for PLHIV included inadequate understanding of TB and benefits of TPT, TB-associated stigma, potential side effects pill burden, and challenges of DOT and SAT 3HP delivery strategies. Lack of experience in the use of digital technology to monitor patient care was identified as a health worker-specific barrier. Identified intervention functions to address the facilitators or barriers included education, persuasion, environmental restructuring, enablement, and training.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a formative qualitative and comprehensive theoretical approach, we identified key barriers, facilitators, and appropriate interventions, including patient education, enhancing trust, and patient-centered treatment support that could be used to optimize the delivery of 3HP to PLHIV in our setting. These interventions are likely generalizable to other clinical interventions in similar populations in sub-Saharan Africa and other TB high-burden settings.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide valuable information for preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions. However, no data exists on pre-MDCT parameters predicting high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) post-MitraClip procedure. We analyzed the preprocedural MDCTs of 156 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institution. The mean TMPG was assessed by periprocedural transesophageal and pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography. MDCT-derived mitral annulus area (MAA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annulus diameters, and mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) were smaller in patients with mean TMPG ≥5 mmHg than those with mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-or 2-clip implantation. Small MAA, AP and ML diameters, and MVOA were moderately correlated with high TMPG post-MitraClip, in which MAA and MVOA had the highest degree of correlation after 1-clip (r = -0.46 both), whereas MAA and ML had the strongest degree of correlation after 2-clip (r = -0.39 both) and at discharge (r = -0.38 both). From the receiver-operating-characteristic curve analyses, no significant differences in the area under the curve were observed among these MDCT parameters for low TMPG after MitraClip implantation, except for those between MAA and AP diameter at discharge (p=0.026). For optimal cutoff values, MAA ≥1100 and ≥1300 mm had positive predictive values of 89% and 91%, while both MAA ≥750 and ≥900 mm had negative predictive values of 100%, for mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation, respectively. In conclusion, in patients undergoing the MitraClip procedure, preprocedural MDCT parameters are useful to predict postprocedural mitral stenosis.