Publications

Communicating bad news to patients and their families is a difficult but routine responsibility for hospitalists. Most practitioners have little or no formal training for this task. Preparation for, delivery of, and follow-up to these conversations should be deliberately planned in order to meet patients' needs. In this article, we review the literature that guides this process and, with a case example, describe steps practitioners can take to effectively deliver bad news and pitfalls that should be avoided. As competency in this skill set is necessary for effective patient care, hands-on training should be part of the core curriculum for all health care practitioners. Hospitalists should be proficient in this area and may serve as role models and instructors for colleagues and trainees.

BACKGROUND

Few research studies have examined the HIV transmission risk behaviors of HIV-positive injection drug users (IDUs) who are men who have sex with men and women (MSMW).

METHODS

We compared unprotected vaginal or anal sex with an HIV-negative or unknown (UNK) status sexual partner of MSMW (n=118) with men who have sex exclusively with women (MSW; n=469) and men who have sex exclusively with men (MSM; n=90) using baseline information from the Intervention for Seropositive Injectors-Research and Evaluation (INSPIRE) study, a 4-city randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

MSMW were twice as likely to report unprotected vaginal sex (P<0.001) and 3 times as likely to report unprotected anal sex with an HIV-negative/UNK status female partner (P<0.001) as MSW. MSMW did not differ in their report of unprotected insertive anal sex and were half as likely to report unprotected receptive anal sex with HIV-negative/UNK status men (P=0.02) as MSM. MSMW were 2 times as likely to report engaging in transactional sex (buying or selling sex in exchange for money, drugs, or housing) than MSM or MSW (81%, 43%, and 36%, respectively; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to understand the contexts of unprotected sex among HIV-positive injection drug-using MSMW. Prevention programs should target the unique prevention needs of this population, particularly their risk with female partners.

OBJECTIVE

To identify modifiable factors associated with health care utilization by HIV-negative seropositive injection drug users (IDUs).

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinal data from 966 participants in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention designed to address medical care, adherence, and risk reduction. The outcomes of this study were usual place for care (clinic vs. emergency room) and frequency of primary care visits.

RESULTS

Results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that increase in "importance of HIV care scale" score (odds ratio [OR]=2.99; P<0.001), empowerment (OR=3.53; P<0.001), utilization of case management (OR=3.07; P=0.007), and having a stable residence (OR=2.63; P=0.008) were significantly associated with participants being "clinic users." Increase in importance of HIV care scale score (OR=5.65; P=0.01) increased empowerment (OR=2.42; P=0.005), taking greater control of one's health (OR=2.17; P=0.001), having health insurance (OR=2.58; P=0.003), utilization of case management (OR=3.14; P=0.027), and CD4 count>or=200 cells/mm (OR=2.09; P=0.007) were significantly associated with reporting 2 or more primary HIV care visits in the past 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Future interventions for this population may be strengthened by addressing the importance of HIV primary care; empowering participants with respect to the health care system; and promoting linkages to case management, health insurance, and local housing programs.