Publications

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)--infected individuals maintaining plasma HIV RNA levels <75 copies/mL in the absence of therapy ("HIV controllers") often maintain high HIV-specific T cell responses, which likely contribute to the control of viral replication. Despite robust immune responses, these individuals never eradicate HIV infection. We hypothesized that HIV-specific CD4(+) T cells might serve as target cells for HIV, contributing to viral persistence in this setting.

METHODS

We measured frequencies of activated (CD38(+) HLA-DR(+)) and HIV Gag-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and plasma- and cell-associated levels of HIV RNA and DNA in a cohort of 38 HIV controllers.

RESULTS

Although there was no evidence of a relationship between the extent of low-level viremia and the frequency of either activated or HIV-specific CD4(+) T cells, controllers with higher HIV-specific CD4(+) T cell frequencies had higher cell-associated HIV DNA levels (ρ = 0.53; P = .019). Higher activated CD4+ T cell frequencies were also associated with higher levels of cell-associated DNA (P = .027) and RNA (P = .0096). However, there was no evidence of a relationship between cell-associated HIV RNA or DNA levels and HIV-specific CD8(+) T cell frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support a model in which strong HIV-specific CD4(+) T cell responses in HIV controllers, while contributing to a potent adaptive immune response, may also contribute to viral persistence, preventing the natural eradication of HIV infection.

BACKGROUND

Advance directive law may compromise the clinical effectiveness of advance directives.

PURPOSE

To identify unintended legal consequences of advance directive law that may prevent patients from communicating end-of-life preferences.

DATA SOURCES

Advance directive legal statutes for all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia and English-language searches of LexisNexis, Westlaw, and MEDLINE from 1966 to August 2010.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers selected 51 advance directive statutes and 20 articles. Three independent legal reviewers selected 105 legal proceedings.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed data sources and used critical content analysis to determine legal barriers to the clinical effectiveness of advance directives. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Legal and content-related barriers included poor readability (that is, laws in all states were written above a 12th-grade reading level), health care agent or surrogate restrictions (for example, 40 states did not include same-sex or domestic partners as default surrogates), and execution requirements needed to make forms legally valid (for example, 35 states did not allow oral advance directives, and 48 states required witness signatures, a notary public, or both). Vulnerable populations most likely to be affected by these barriers included patients with limited literacy, limited English proficiency, or both who cannot read or execute advance directives; same-sex or domestic partners who may be without legally valid and trusted surrogates; and unbefriended, institutionalized, or homeless patients who may be without witnesses and suitable surrogates.

LIMITATION

Only appellate-level legal cases were available, which may have excluded relevant cases.

CONCLUSION

Unintended negative consequences of advance directive legal restrictions may prevent all patients, and particularly vulnerable patients, from making and communicating their end-of-life wishes and having them honored. These restrictions have rendered advance directives less clinically useful. Recommendations include improving readability, allowing oral advance directives, and eliminating witness or notary requirements.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the Pfizer Foundation.

A report of the 8th annual Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy meeting, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA, 17-21 November 2010.