Publications

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test the Brief Index of Lupus Damage (BILD), an interviewer-administered measure of damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), for use in epidemiologic studies in which administration of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) by trained physicians is not possible or feasible. In addition, we compared the BILD to another recently developed patient-reported measure, the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ), which was designed as a written survey.

METHODS

A sample of 81 patients from 2 university-affiliated SLE clinics was used to test the criterion validity of the BILD and the LDIQ. A second sample, the Lupus Outcomes Study (n = 728), was used to ascertain the construct validity of the BILD.

RESULTS

We found good agreement between most BILD items and corresponding SDI items, and moderately high overall Spearman's rank correlations for SDI with BILD (0.64) and with LDIQ (0.54). BILD scores were higher among older individuals, those with longer disease duration, and those with higher mean disease activity in the preceding 4 years. In addition, higher BILD scores were associated with poorer self-rated health and functional status, greater unemployment and work disability, and increased health care utilization.

CONCLUSION

We developed and performed a preliminary validation study demonstrating content, criterion, and construct validity of a new practical patient-reported instrument of SLE disease damage. Although further studies are needed to examine reliability and to document psychometric properties in other populations, the BILD appears to represent a promising tool for studies of SLE outside the clinical setting.

For more than four decades, modulation of estrogen receptor activity with antiestrogens has been a successful strategy for the treatment of breast cancer. However, therapeutic resistance limits this approach. Patients whose tumors lack estrogen receptors are not candidates for antiestrogens. Furthermore, roughly half that do express estrogen receptors fail to respond. Together, these tumors are considered to be de novo resistant. For those with tumors that do respond, most will eventually acquire resistance. As such, the underlying mechanisms of both de novo and acquired resistance have been the subject of considerable research, so that new therapeutic targets might be discovered and developed. From this work, epigenetic regulation of gene expression has emerged as a major contributor to both forms of resistance. In this article, we present our current understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to antiestrogen resistance, focusing on epigenetic regulation, and examine the approaches being used that target epigenetic machinery to overcome resistance both in the laboratory and in the clinic.

Collecting reliable and valid data is an increasing expectation within palliative care. Data remain the crux for demonstrating value and quality of care, which are the critical steps to program sustainability. Parallel goals of conducting research and performing quality assessment and improvement can also ensure program growth, financial health, and viability in an increasingly competitive environment. Mounting expectations by patients, hospitals, and payers and inevitable pay-for-performance paradigms have transitioned data collection procedures from novel projects to expected standard operation within usual palliative care delivery. We present types of data to collect, published guides for data collection, and how data can inform quality, value, and research within a palliative care organization. Our experiences with the Quality Data Collection Tool (QDACT) in the Carolinas Palliative Care Consortium to collect data on quality have led to valuable lessons learned in creating a data collection system. Suggested steps in forming data-sharing collaborations and building data collection procedures are shared.

Asthma is a common disease with a complex risk architecture including both genetic and environmental factors. We performed a meta-analysis of North American genome-wide association studies of asthma in 5,416 individuals with asthma (cases) including individuals of European American, African American or African Caribbean, and Latino ancestry, with replication in an additional 12,649 individuals from the same ethnic groups. We identified five susceptibility loci. Four were at previously reported loci on 17q21, near IL1RL1, TSLP and IL33, but we report for the first time, to our knowledge, that these loci are associated with asthma risk in three ethnic groups. In addition, we identified a new asthma susceptibility locus at PYHIN1, with the association being specific to individuals of African descent (P = 3.9 × 10(-9)). These results suggest that some asthma susceptibility loci are robust to differences in ancestry when sufficiently large samples sizes are investigated, and that ancestry-specific associations also contribute to the complex genetic architecture of asthma.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA monitoring during antiviral therapy is essential for early prediction of treatment success and failure to peginterferon alfa/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy.

OBJECTIVES

In this multi-center study we assessed the clinical utility of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for monitoring patients undergoing antiviral therapy for chronic infection with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-3.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed serum from 361 patients with chronic hepatitis C who had been treated with PEG-IFN/RBV. The predictive value of rapid virologic response (RVR), partial (≥2log(10) decline) and complete (HCV-RNA undetectable) early virologic response (pEVR/cEVR) based on RealTime HCV for achieving sustained virologic response was evaluated. In addition, the utility of RealTime HCV to tailor treatment duration according to individual virologic responses was studied in a subset of 136 GT 1 patients and compared to the reference tests, Versant HCV Quantitative 3.0 (bDNA) and Qualitative (TMA) assay.

RESULTS

At week 4 of therapy, patients with RVR had a 100% and 93.5% probability to achieve an SVR in GT 1 and GT 2/3 patients, respectively. At week 12, patients who did not achieve a pEVR had a 97.2% and 100% probability of not achieving an SVR. In addition, assignment of GT 1 patients to abbreviated or extended treatment durations based on low baseline HCV-RNA (<800,000IU/mL) and RVR or pEVR was highly concordant between RealTime HCV and bDNA/TMA assays (97.8% and 91.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The RealTime HCV assay is suitable for monitoring virologic response to PEG-INF/RBV therapy and tailoring treatment duration accordingly.

CONTEXT

The treatment of pain in patients with substance use disorders creates tensions for clinicians between undertreating pain and enabling opioid analgesic misuse.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize prevalence and factors associated with aberrant opioid analgesic behaviors in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals who are at high risk for opioid analgesic misuse.

METHODS

We assessed pain and substance use disorders in a cross-sectional study that enrolled 296 participants from the Research on Access to Care in the Homeless cohort, a community-based sample of indigent HIV-infected adults. We measured aberrant opioid behaviors, defined as major or minor depending on level of risk of harm to patients, using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview technology.

RESULTS

Most participants (91.2%) reported pain in the week before interview, with the majority of these experiencing severe pain (53.7%). More than two-thirds (69.2%) of the participants met criteria for a lifetime history of cocaine, amphetamine, or heroin/opioid use disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). More than one-third of the sample (37.4%) had a history of aberrant opioid behavior within 90 days of interview. One-fifth (18.5%) had a history of "major" aberrant behaviors.

CONCLUSION

In this high-risk population, severe pain is common and aberrant opioid behaviors are prevalent but not universal. As recommended by American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine guidelines, when prescribing opioid analgesics, clinicians must consider variation in the severity of aberrant behaviors, particularly aberrant behaviors that may represent undertreatment of pain.