Publications

BACKGROUND

Despite its high potency against hepatitis B virus (HBV), entecavir (ETV) 0.5 mg daily may not be sufficient to induce complete viral suppression in some patients with very high pretreatment viremia. It is not clear whether ETV 1.0 mg daily would have additive effect in such patients.

GOALS

Our goal was to examine virologic outcome of ETV 1.0 mg daily in patients with partial response to ETV 0.5 mg daily.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 31 consecutive treatment-naive patients who were switched to ETV 1.0 mg daily after partial response [reduction of HBV DNA ≥2 log10 IU/mL but with detectable HBV DNA levels (>100 IU/mL) after 24 weeks of therapy or longer] with ETV 0.5 mg daily from January 2005 to January 2010 at 2 clinics.

RESULTS

All patients were Asians and 90% had positive hepatitis B e antigen. Mean HBV DNA was 8.04±0.65 log10 IU/mL before therapy and 3.64±0.91 log10 IU/mL at the time of switch. Overall rate of complete viral suppression were 29% (n=9/31) after 24 weeks of ETV 1.0 mg daily and 22% (n=5/23) after 48 weeks. Complete viral suppression after 24 weeks with ETV 1.0 mg daily was significantly higher in patients with lower HBV DNA (<3 log10 IU/mL) at time of switch: 75% versus 5%, P<0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with partial response to ETV 0.5 mg daily did not achieve complete viral suppression with the higher dose of ETV 1.0 mg daily except those with minimal residual viremia (HBV DNA <3 log10 IU/mL).

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment end-point of therapy for patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) includes HBeAg seroconversion, which ranges from 15% to 22% after 1 year of oral nucleos(t)ides according to clinical trials. Our goal was to determine the incidence and predictors of HBeAg seroconversion in such patients in routine clinical practice because they may differ than reported rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 333 consecutive treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive patients who were treated for CHB between 1/2000 and 6/2010 at three gastroenterology and liver clinics in the USA. Primary study end-point was HBeAg seroconversion-loss of HBeAg and antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe) development.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were Asian (96%). Median treatment duration prior to HBeAg seroconversion was 50 (range 26-52) weeks. Of the 333 study patients, 25% received lamivudine, 16% adefovir, 51% entecavir, and 8% tenofovir. HBeAg seroconversion at month 12 was 8.2%. On multivariate analysis inclusive of age, gender, and antiviral agents, independent predictors for HBeAg seroconversion at month 12 were hepatitis B virus DNA < 7.5 log10  IU/mL (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.59 [1.04-6.44]), P = 0.041) and alanine transaminase (ALT) > 1.5 × upper normal limit (HR = 2.86 [1.05-7.81], P = 0.040), but not the choice of nucleos(t)ides.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBeAg seroconversion rate seen in clinical settings for oral nucleos(t)ides appears much lower than those reported in pivotal trials, especially in patients with lower ALT and higher HBV DNA levels. HBeAg-positive patients should be counseled about the high possibility of the long treatment duration required to achieve recommended treatment end-points.

Over the last several years, cardiac biomarkers have proven to be increasingly useful for disease screening, diagnosis, and prognostication. The most widely used biomarkers in heart failure (HF) are natriuretic peptides (NPs), which can aid in diagnosing HF, while also identifying those who are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Multiple clinical trials have investigated the role of NPs as therapeutic targets for HF management, but results have been conflicting. Collectively, however, the data suggest that NP levels may be useful in guiding HF management and improving HF-related morbidity and mortality. In this review, we summarize existing data investigating the use of NPs as targets for outpatient HF therapy, focusing on differences in study designs and lessons learned from the results. Although the results for this approach are promising overall, we propose that additional well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials-specifically incorporating the relevant lessons learned from previous studies-are necessary to pivotally establish the role of NP-guided outpatient HF management.