Publications

CONTEXT

Despite increasing interest in advance care planning (ACP) and previous ACP descriptions, a consensus definition does not yet exist to guide clinical, research, and policy initiatives.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a consensus definition of ACP for adults.

METHODS

We convened a Delphi panel of multidisciplinary, international ACP experts consisting of 52 clinicians, researchers, and policy leaders from four countries and a patient/surrogate advisory committee. We conducted 10 rounds using a modified Delphi method and qualitatively analyzed panelists' input. Panelists identified several themes lacking consensus and iteratively discussed and developed a final consensus definition.

RESULTS

Panelists identified several tensions concerning ACP concepts such as whether the definition should focus on conversations vs. written advance directives; patients' values vs. treatment preferences; current shared decision making vs. future medical decisions; and who should be included in the process. The panel achieved a final consensus one-sentence definition and accompanying goals statement: "Advance care planning is a process that supports adults at any age or stage of health in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. The goal of advance care planning is to help ensure that people receive medical care that is consistent with their values, goals and preferences during serious and chronic illness." The panel also described strategies to best support adults in ACP.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary Delphi panel developed a consensus definition for ACP for adults that can be used to inform implementation and measurement of ACP clinical, research, and policy initiatives.

OBJECTIVE

Liver disease markers have been associated with mortality in HIV-infected individuals in the modern era of effective antiretroviral therapy. Our objective was to determine which markers are most predictive of mortality in HIV-monoinfected and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected persons.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We measured serum albumin, total protein, calculated globulin, aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase in 193 HIV/HCV-coinfected and 720 HIV-monoinfected persons in the study of Fat Redistribution and Metabolic Change in HIV Infection. We evaluated associations of each marker with 5-year, all-cause mortality, adjusting for cardiovascular, HIV-related factors, inflammation, renal disease, muscle, and adiposity.

RESULTS

After 5 years of follow-up, overall mortality was 21% in HIV/HCV-coinfected and 12% in HIV-monoinfected participants. After multivariable adjustment, lower albumin and higher AST were independently associated with increased mortality. Lower albumin was associated with 49% increased odds of mortality overall [per 0.5 g/dl decrease, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.9]; the association was stronger in HIV/HCV-coinfected [odds ratio (OR) = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.2] vs. HIV-monoinfected (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; HCV-by-albumin interaction: P = 0.038). Higher AST was associated with 41% increased odds of mortality (per AST doubling; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8); associations were much stronger among HIV/HCV-coinfected (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.5-4.1) than HIV-monoinfected (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.8-1.5; HCV-by-AST interaction: P = 0.0042).

CONCLUSION

Lower serum albumin and higher AST appear to be important mortality risk factors in HIV/HCV-coinfection, but much less so in HIV-monoinfected individuals. The association of low albumin with mortality may reflect its role as a negative acute phase response protein. AST levels do not appear to be useful in predicting mortality in HIV-monoinfection and should be considered primarily in the context of HCV-coinfection.

The impact of real-time electronic monitoring on antiretroviral therapy adherence warrants further study. We conducted an analysis of cohort participants that initially involved standard electronic adherence monitoring (EAM), followed by real-time EAM and home visits for sustained at least 48-h adherence interruptions. Immediately after switching between the two types of EAM, mean adherence among 112 participants increased from 84% to 93% and remained elevated for 6 months (P < 0.001). Real-time EAM is a promising approach for improving adherence.