Publications

OBJECTIVE

A prior study established that concurrent poverty, persistent poverty, and exiting poverty were associated with the subsequent extent of damage accumulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we examined whether concurrent poverty affects mortality after taking extent of damage accumulation into account.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted on 807 persons with SLE participating in the University of California-San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study in 2009, stratified by whether they lived in households with incomes ≤125% of the federal poverty level in that year. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the risk of mortality as a function of poverty status, with and without adjustment for demographics; lupus status, including extent of disease damage; overall health status; health behaviors; and health care characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 807 individuals interviewed in 2009, 71 (8.8%) had died by 2015, 57 (8.3%) among the nonpoor and 14 (12.1%) among the poor (P = 0.18). With adjustment only for age, poverty in 2009 was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.18-3.88]) through 2015. However, after adjustment for extent of damage and age, poverty was no longer associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.68 [95% CI 0.91-3.10]). Among those who died, those who were poor lived 13.9 fewer years (95% CI 6.9-20.8; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The principal way that poverty results in higher mortality in SLE is by increasing the extent of damage accumulation.

It is important for both individual- and population-level health that HIV-infected individuals progress through the Care Continuum. However, HIV-infected youth frequently disengage from care during transition from pediatric/adolescent to adult care; only 50% remain in adult care after 1 year. Understanding how providers define and approach a successful healthcare transition can improve the delivery of HIV-related services during critical years of HIV treatment. We conducted 58 staff interviews across 14 Adolescent Trials Network clinics (n = 30) and 20 adult clinics (n = 28). We used the constant comparative method to examine how providers defined and approached youths' successful transition. Providers identified four components critical to successful transition: (1) clinical outcomes (e.g., medication adherence and viral suppression); (2) youth knowing how to complete treatment-related activities (e.g., refilling prescriptions and making appointments); (3) youth taking responsibility for treatment-related activities and their overall health (e.g., "when they stop reaching out to the adolescent [clinic] to solve all their problems."); and (4) youth feeling a connection and trust toward the adult clinic (e.g., "they feel safe here"), with some providers even prioritizing connectedness over clinical outcomes (e.g., "Even if they're not taking meds but are connected [to care], …that's a success."). The identification of key components of successful transition can guide focused interventions and resources to improve youth maintenance in the HIV Care Continuum as they transition to adult care. Identifying what facilitates successful transitions, and the gaps that interventions can target, will help to ensure HIV-infected youth remain healthy across their lifespan.